Allow external media to watch this YouTube video.
18 June 2026
AI for Qualitative Data Analysis
How to use AI responsibly and methodologically soundly, with attention to traceability, limitations, and evidence-linked analysis.
Watch on YouTube ↗Read the full webinar overview
The strengths and limitations of general-purpose AI
The webinar examines how researchers are using tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and NotebookLM. These tools can be useful for brainstorming, editing and summarising, but they are not designed around the methodological requirements of qualitative analysis. Long or complex datasets can be fragmented, and important context may be lost as the model processes only parts of the material at a time.
Context loss and subtle hallucinations
Hallucination does not only mean inventing facts. AI can also smooth out differences between participants, over-generalise across cases, blend separate accounts or fill gaps with plausible explanations that are not supported by the data. The session discusses why these less obvious distortions are particularly difficult to notice when researchers move too quickly from uploaded material to conclusions.
Human oversight and source grounding
AI should support the researcher rather than replace interpretation. A methodologically defensible workflow requires every proposed pattern or claim to remain connected to the original transcripts, field notes or documents. Source grounding allows researchers to inspect the evidence, challenge the AI’s reading and decide whether an interpretation is warranted.
QInsights as a qualitative analysis workspace
QInsights is introduced as an environment built specifically for qualitative material. Researchers can explore topics, ask questions, compare perspectives and develop findings through dialogue while retaining access to the supporting source segments. The emphasis remains on researcher-led analysis rather than one-click automation.
